Rb5009 vs pfsense forum This isn't just an issue of the 2. Does anyone have real world experience with these in larger home or small office setup and how the roaming stacks up vs the competition. Small issue I'm having and having trouble finding anything on the forums. PFSense ISO Download Requires an Account and Billing Address RB5009 vs CCR2004 vs CCR1016 Feb 22, 2020 · EDIT: After further research, it seems like this topic has changed into an Ubiquity Edgerouter vs Pfsense box so i have changed the topic accordingly. For example: DNS overwrites! PfSense just does that via the GUI… Or Policy based routing! Something a lot of people don't know about: We offer a free, cloud-based, encrypted (as in not even we can read it so don't lose your encryption key) backup solution called AutoConfigBackup. I just found a good offer (or so I think) on a ProtectLi FW4B. Features. IPQ4018 /IPQ4019 has AQM support and doesn't have AFE/NAT Initial config and setup of the SG100 was by far one of the most painful product experiences I've experienced. The vlan guest network I set up works fine, but I wasn't able to get the airplay-type devices to show up on the guest devices with a mDNS repeater RB5009 is vastly superior in design, using a single switch chip between all ports, with HW accelerated vlans. Although I switched to the RB5009 (and Audience for wifi) this last year, I previously used the (non-wifi) RB4011 as my main router, along with some RB4011wifi (5G) and cAP ac (2G) as I wrote in that previous post (so I could run the wifiwave2 package). In my experience pfsense will run forever without issue. Would a pfsense box or Edgerouter be more appropriate for this situation and what are the pros and cons of each? Double the usual performance: we took your feedback from the MikroTik User Meetings to create the perfect home lab router: compact, powerful, with multiple powering options and efficient cooling. All my mikrotik equipment just boot in swirchos. The RB5009 will probably be a bit faster at WireGuard due to the higher clock rate of the cores but personally I think the CCR1009 is much better overall thanks to the additional cores. I used to run pfSense, and while there is a lot more stuff you can pile onto a pfSense system, I found myself not using most of it. I guess 1x CRS112 and later on 1xCRS112 PoE could be a good pick. The RB5009 already has more ports than can be routed at full speed, 19. Edit 2: Plot twist. 5G > 10G. RB5009 vs pfSense/OPNSense upvotes Hmmm. Just now I tried to go to newegg and the request failed in my browser. Apparently it has images for OpenWRT and various Linux OSs. Lets say you were a startup and yet you had Traffic maxing out your shiny 100mbbps hot shit It runs proxmox hosting pfsense 2. 5 to the cable modem, 10 to my core switch & desktops. The ESP32 series employs either a Tensilica Xtensa LX6, Xtensa LX7 or a RiscV processor, and both dual-core and single-core variations are available. If I remove advertising 2. 0. The RB5009 can also run containers, which can add some choice functionality. 0G full duplex, the transfer rate increases to 650 to 850 Mb/s. I got my RB5009 setup and sometimes I see weird things. ESP32 is a series of low cost, low power system on a chip microcontrollers with integrated Wi-Fi and dual-mode Bluetooth. I've also used Pfsense for many years. Asus RT-AC58U vs RT-AX53U vs D-Link DIR-2640. 5G link, it happens on the RB5009 at 1G with 10G hosts. I would like to keep it as low budget as possible, buying used hardware off ebay is fine. MikroTik RB5009UPr+S+IN Internal DC Input Block. Paid commercial support is also available. pfsense or pfsense virtualized. And when I added Mikrotik tunnel following this tutorial I randomly can ping network on the mikrotik lan side. It's not a bad tool, it just needs a ton of work. pfSense is commonly deployed as a perimeter firewall, router, wireless access point, DHCP server, DNS server, and as a VPN endpoint. Pfsense feeds the main 10gig and I have fiber or dac from the 10gig feeding the 3 other 1gig switches. 5G and only advertise 1. So far I used pfSense on ALIX and APU devices from PC Engines, as also virtually on VMs. I would personally go with your 3rd option of pfsense and 10Gb switch. Professional Router: RB5009 vs CCR2004 vs CCR1016 I‘m currently on a purchase decision for multiple mikrotiks which will be used in event deployments. Hey everyone. If it can, I should probably add USB ports to the concepts. It's RB5009 vs L009. rb5009 vs ccr2004-16g-2s+pc Hi all, I recently got my fibre connection and my isp supplied met with an Huawei XGS pon which has a 10Gbps copper ethernet port. RB5009 vs pfSense/OPNSense r/mikrotik, Model number: HUNSN CPU: Intel Celeron Processor 3855U (2M Cache, AES-NI Supported: Yes Memory: x Sodimm DDR3-1866/2133, 16g. But the RB5009 has a screw terminal for power on the side which I usually use in rack setups to avoid having power barrel jack sticking out of the front, where it interferes with rack doors, SFP cabling and is prone to get unplugged or damaged during rack maintenance. It is available for pfSense CE and pfSense Plus installs and backs up every config change you make automatically. Just bought a rb5009ug+s+in. It's not to take away from how impressive the RB5009 is, just providing some fun context to the conversation. Switching is faster on RB5009 than on RB4011 (that shouldn't surprise anyone knowing the cheap RTL8367 used in RB4011), but not exactly 63% stated by RB5009 propaganda. You can see on the chart where the RB750Gr3 was being used from 12/25 through 1/12 and then the RB5009 from 1/13 through 1/16 and then the RB4011 from 1/17 through 1/23. Unanswered topics; Active topics; Search Mar 21, 2016 · Main router is PFSense based. But I can get a MikroTik RB5009 for $180. So I just went from "Not buying a FW", to "It is the first thing I have bought" eheh. I went to order the RB5009 5 minutes ago, once someone said it is rare :P Your post make me have buyer remorse. 1. Apr 26, 2018 · OPNsense gets more frequent updates than pfSense, and that matters if you are concerned about security. Oct 17, 2024 · This. Given the cost of network appliances it’s probably the cheapest route to go down but then there’s the whole maintainence/ learning curve. “RB” devices can be used anywhere, but the RB5009 specifically was designed to be the best all-round routing device for enthusiasts (home labs, tinkerers, or cramming 4 routers into a single 1U to maximize lab space efficiency). Planning on connecting it via SFP to an Ubiquiti US-48-750W switch to 40 or so connections (rooms, APs, Sonos, IP cameras and the rest). Apr 29, 2023 · The handoff from the ONT is 10Gbps RJ45 (not fiber), I have 10Gbps and 2. So I'm going with Mikrotik. MikroTik now provides hardware and software for Internet connectivity in most of the countries around the world. I have 4 PFSense To PFSense Site 2 Site tunnels running fine (shared key based). I'd love to hear your thought and ideas. Is there a Mac mini with >1 NIC or is that just obtained through thunderbolt dongles? I would search the Verizon community forums to get more information. If you have a greater than 1G internet connection and so utilize the SFP+ and 2. I’m also pretty security conscious, so I’m looking to create vlans to segregate my network. Am I in for a lot of frustration with RouterOS, coming from OPNsense? I do have a Windows machine and can use Winbox. 5G port. Pages immediately loaded snappier after switching to the RB5009. I’m just getting into homelabbing (recently built my server running proxmox). So really the question should never be RB5009 vs RB4011. Feb 23, 2021 · The MikroTik CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS is based on ARM architecture, hence is not supported as OPNsense can be currently installed on x86-64 hardware only. I struggled to get more than 300mbps inter-vlan routing with this device. A custom firewall is going to be better at everything than a fully integrated solution, except for size, noise and especially power consumption. UniFi routers are okay when you only need a few firewall rules, VLAN’s & DHCP… It will work fine! But pfSense gives you so much more fine control! PfSense makes more complex setups quite easy while UniFi simply won’t work for many requirements. Anyway, I'm happy with what I have it works well, and was a lot cheaper than the alternative Draytek Multi-Wan solution that I was looking at. I'm not sure if it can be managed via the USB port. 4 Core ARM with no Multithreading vs 2 Core MIPS with Multithreading MediaTek MT7621AT has AFE and hardware accelerator for NAT and doesn't have AQM. Aug 23, 2021 · MikroTik. Ultimately, the MikroTik firewall vs pfSense decision boils down to use case priorities. 5+10Gb routers, which are tempting, but I don't really have the motivation to tinker with (learn) pfsense or opnsense or other custom stuff, and I found this Mikrotik router for €180 used. Sep 4, 2021 · The second switch that I'd buy later on will be PoE as it will also power the AP's and I'll be able to run fiber between the switches. If you are wondering what Amateur Radio is about, it's basically a two way radio service where licensed operators throughout the world experiment and communicate with each other on frequencies reserved for license holders. 5G, 1G to 1G, etc) and always get full speed bypassing the RB5009. So if you use it as an uplink for a network, saturating that uplink would mean that downstream devices have zero upload bandwidth. ARM WiFi 5 vs MIPS WiFi 6 vs MIPS Wifi 5? MT7621AT (AFE, NAT accelerator) vs IPQ4018/19 (AQM). Oct 23, 2000 · I'm currently using a Mikrotik RB5009, which I can't generally recommend due to a pesky bug. We can see RB5009 on the main PCB. Oct 5, 2021 · When the RB5009 ether1 WAN port is "advertising" 2. mikrotik. Plus it is completely passively cooled, so no noise if that is important to you. Jan 24, 2022 · We decided to try a RB5009 and a RB4011 to see how they would handle the CPU load. Where FW has ease of use and setup, pfSense has too many features and options to choose from. I'm still wondering in what setup someone would want to have the power plug sticking out of the front. Jul 21, 2021 · Calculation shows, that RB5009 is 0. 5Gb port and an SFP+ (10Gb) port to support a 1200Mbps Internet connection. There's a hope that Mikrotik is planning more devices in the same form factor (they've already said that there are more variants of the 5009 coming but I'm also referring to Jul 21, 2021 · Calculation shows, that RB5009 is 0. There is a post in the PFsense forums Slow Multi-Gigi Performance on RB5009 Just got the rare RB5009 today and I am planning on replacing my RB4011 with the RB5009. Access managed using tailscale ACL rules. Cables & transceivers are supposed to be here tomorrow. Recently, my cable internet provider, Cox, has implemented the new DOCSIS 3. I probably can get away with 1x RB4011/RB5009 and later on 1x CRS112 PoE but the switching of RB5009 would be worst I think. 09. 5G ISP modem with gigabit speed service, the data transfer speed drops by about half to 300 to 400 Mb/s. RB5009 vs pfSense/OPNSense upvotes I'm using DOH for my dns setup, have been for a long time on pfsense. If you are interested in intrusion detection, OPNsense natively supports Suricata while pfSense supports Snort (although I think you may be able to install either package in both). 8 and the 5009 is using 7. Namun, memilih antara keduanya bisa jadi membingungkan karena memiliki beberapa perbedaan. From what I've read, they're basically the same except for OPNSense has a better UI, better Wireguard support, and more packages, so I was leaning towards going with OPNSense. pfSense is an open source firewall/router computer software distribution based on FreeBSD. I have 2 tailscale Dockers running on my server - one for public services routed from pfsense running on a vps and one for private services accessable by people on my tailnet. I never saw it discussed within the scope of a small home or basic network. Neither is what I would consider easy to set up. If you have an S+RJ10 or similar module handy you could try putting that in the SFP+ slot and seeing if you still have the same issue at 2. Ubiquiti ER-X - great little device that I ran for 2 years straight. In my opinion RB5009 has useless features: USB port and containers, but I decided to leave 5009 meanwhile AX2 was returned. This is not something I would use now, though more for future proofing if we ever get fiber internet faster than 1Gb. Feb 19, 2024 · I'm a long time (over 15 years) pfSense user, now moving to OPNsense once my new fiber connection is ready, as OPNsense offers better NAT performance in my tests. 14% slower than RB4011 while RB5009 propaganda states 69% performance increase. RB5009: stable 930-950 Mbps RB5009 is expensive in 2 times than AX2, but it always cold, has more performance and uses less resources, it`s router for years, just add any non-mikrotik AP and be happy. I also have a MT switch (CSS610) and have a few devices connected there that show up under our base wifi connected devices. If you go with topton or any device with the 2. I have an intentional hodge-podge of a Unifi AP (controller software on a Proxmox container on my main server), a Mikrotik switch, and pfSense running on an old Dell 1U server. Nov 21, 2024 · Search. 5GB Ethernet port and a SFP+ 10 Gbit port. Pick the one that best suites your port / performance needs. This is still incomplete, but I thought I would post what I have so far Non-Code Differences Cast of Characters Manuel Kasper – Original m0n0wall developer Netgate/ESF/RCL – Corporate owner of pfSense. Means the CPU can spend it's time exclusively routing and running other services. Can I just upgrade to 7. Bringing me to my final thoughts on pfSense v Firewalla. I refreshed and newegg loaded. Quick links. My 4011 is using 7. I'm setting up a home network with a Unifi AP and a firewall, and I was wondering whether I should use PFSense or OPNSense. I was planning to try pfsense. The RB5009 does not have a serial port. 6. They should be in charge of routing+nat+dhcp+dns+ntp in envoirments of up to 750 Clients, mostly wireless clients behind ruckus access-points and some wired clients often performing “CCR” devices are intended to be datacenter or other critical applications. My unit came running rOS 7. com I want to say the EdgeRouter-X is only 1 Gbps half duplex between ports and CPU (so client devices can't simultaneously download and upload at 1 Gbps) unlike the hEX S which has a 2 Gbps full duplex link between the ports and CPU unless you use the SFP cage, in which case it becomes a 1 Gbps full duplex link between the ports and CPU. I personally have an RB5009 and I really like the fact that it is future proof with a 2. I've done extensive testing and bypassed the RB5009 in every scenario (10G to 2. Pfsense/Opnsense has things Mikrotik doesn't such as IPS (via Snort/Suricata), additional helpful packages like NTOP and others, and things like Pfblocker in PFsense etc. supports the chipset. Exploring pfsense vs mikrotik performance reveals distinct strengths in different network setups. The RB5009 is quite capable. Distributors in other countries are receiving units before US-based ones but many of them ship to the US. Nov 5, 2017 · Hello, I am new to pfsense but so far from doing research on what my options are pfsense seems to make the most sense. MikroTik RB5009UPr+S+IN Internal Overview. Made exactly the same switch recently. I used to have pfSense running on esxi, but switched to pfSense on proxmox about 18 months ago, that ran great until I upgraded to a 500/70 fibre WAN connection and pfSense maxed out at about 350Mb/s. Then I am in the need to add next one, but this one has to be mikrotik based and it cannot be shared key based as I realized. I'm wondering if a BananaPi BPI-W2 could handle being a pfSense router. Right now the network is Modem -(2. Dec 20, 2013 · If anyone doesn't consider IDS, IPS and VPN, only consider packet forwarding and routing, passmark 1500 is pretty enough for 1Gbps up and down. Need a router, prebuilt with low power draw, has SFP. 5 gb ports. Nov 17, 2016 · I looked into the Unifi Dream Machine Pro but all of those thoughts went away after reading many threads comparing unifi vs ruckus. Firmware and routerOS are both on 7. I’m looking into pfsense, and I’ve read this is possible (despite there being dedicated options): • Are some models better than others? Is a 2011 model vs 2014 vs 2019 better for pfsense, for example? • I’ve read more than 1 NIC is necessary. May 10, 2023 · Pfsense - Was because you can scale up on your own. I know there have been many of discussions on pfSense vs. 5G full duplex and is connected to a 2. It does a really good job with a 1000/50 internet service and a network of ~100 devices across 5 VLANs. Netgate SG-2220 (pfsense) - overall, I like the pfsense GUI and am most comfortable working in it compared to other distributions. pfSense supports installation of 3rd party packages like Snort or Squid through its Package Manager. I have exactly the same issue (mikrotik + pihole acting as a doh). It looks like the UDM Pro has 2x10Gbe vs. An unofficial forum for discussion of ASRock Products, News, BIOS updates and Troubleshooting. 1 standard, currently offering me an internet plan of 1Gbps Download and 35Mbps Upload speeds. More than anything else, it's been awesome to have native support for WireGuard. Aug 3, 2020 · pfSense is an open source firewall solution that businesses are able to access for free. The next step is Wireguard and Zerotier, after that I'm pretty much set until Mikrotik releases their Wi-Fi 7 gear (I've got recent Asus Wi-Fi 6 routers that unfortunately works fine, can't replace Mar 3, 2024 · That's because, even if I get the PoE version, I'd rather reserve the "heat budget" of the RB5009 for its own processing, routing and marking tasks, rather than heat it up unnecessarily by powering 6 or 7 devices. I know this isn't the topology you want but it might tell you something. Free support is offered via mailing list, an online forum and an IRC channel. There is other home-automation stuff I would rather spend time on. 5, there isn't really much documentation about the firmware or what it looks like on the new rOS 7-exclusive units (aside from the Chateau) so I'm happy to try to answer questions that people have. Also I do have some support and security concerns about Mikrotik, as it is a smaller company, etc. I was previously running an instance on a VM through proxmox using a 1Gb dual nic as well and was getting 600 Mbps at most. 5Gb RJ45)-> ER-6P -(1Gb RJ45)-> US-8-150W (1Gb SFP Opt)-> US Just for reference, for Firewalls, I was looking at those "Mini fanless PCs" with PfSense or OPNsense. MikroTik and pfSense can both be used to protect business networks through firewalls, but they also have a few standout features that set them apart from each other. Oct 26, 2023 · As I'm a beginner with Mikrotik devices I kindly ask for your opinion of using the RB5009UPr+S+IN as a replacement for pfsense. The initial general setup is relatively easy, and the only time you need to touch it is if you're making network changes. My country RB5009 is SGD379, hAP AC2 is SGD$115. MikroTik is a Latvian company which was founded in 1996 to develop routers and wireless ISP systems. 5Gb and 2. There is a really good thread on the servethehome forums talking about these minipcs it's worth I don't have an RB5009 (yet) myself but I've read about a lot of issues with the 2. System resources are nearly identical when idle vs full bandwidth. For ARM solutions, it means Mikrotik rb4011/rb5009 and Unifi dream machine pro are enough for 1Gbps up and down without these stuffs. the 1x10Gbe of the Router Boards. It was a case of upgrade the server hardware, buy a microPC to run pfSense directly or buy a physical router. It worked well and I understand its benefits and limitations. However, during my digging I've also come across OPNSense which seems a lot better than pfSense. I do have mikrotik APs and I use them for my IoT network. There is plenty of capacity left for other VMs. Even though enterprise might not take huge risks. Apr 9, 2023 · There are documented problems with ports on this router in the forums and on reddit. 4 kpps (RB3011) vs 761 kpps (RB5009) 64 byte "routing with 25 ip filter rules" official test results, however I have thought about buying a UDM Pro for a long time, but ended up going with a Mikrotik RB5009 due to price and form factor reasons. As an extra photo, we had one of the DC terminal block here. Right now pfsense is used for: - basic firewall to get the networks up - 4 vlans - 4 dhcp server for the 4 vlans - 2 vpn-client connections (wireguard) - 1 zerotier - 1 wan for the vpns and zerotier also I moved from pfSense to UniFi to MikroTik (specifically the RB5009). 7. 5G, 1G to 2. Posted by u/Forward_Vacation_229 - 14 votes and 26 comments May 3, 2018 · I started trying to understand the OPNsense / pfSense split a while ago, and thought I would make a post of what I know so far. If I go the protectli route, I’ll install pfsense or OPNsense, and if I go MikroTik I’ll obviously use their os. My experience is that the RB5009 and RB4011 are pretty comparable in terms of routing speed (both running RouterOS 7. On the other hand, pfSense is a completely open-source solution, freely available for download from the developer's website. I don't know anything about the setup of pfsense or MikroTik, so either will be a learning process. I am willing to build my own and use pfsense or openwrt although I have had trouble finding hardware requirements. Right now pfsense is used for: - basic firewall to get the networks up - 4 vlans - 4 dhcp server for the 4 vlans - 2 vpn-client connections (wireguard) - 1 zerotier - 1 wan for the vpns and zerotier also A community-contributed subreddit for all things Mikrotik. 8 on the 5009 and then restore my 5009 with the 4011 backup? What is the best practice for this? Going to give my old man the RB4011 and use Wireguard for S2S VPN. New hardware Sep 5, 2021 · The second switch that I'd buy later on will be PoE as it will also power the AP's and I'll be able to run fiber between the switches. I already have all my Pcs hooked up with sfp+ on my CR305-1G-4S+, so I figured I would opt to try and run full 10Gbps. Also i was thinking about going either an asus router as the gateway or a pfsense box. Since I moved from my ISP modem/router to the Mikrotik it’s just been a charm In earlier versions of pfsense/opnsense, wireguard was implemented as a userspace binary, just like OpenVPN, which was significantly slower than native kernel module support. Most likely due to pricing, pfSense is most popular with small businesses. Whether it can do a BSD OS like pfSense though I can't find out. Built a new standalone device using a SFF desktop and a 10Gb nic X540-T2 and speed tests are only giving me less than 100 Mbps. For example, I'm running Pi-Hole as a container on my RB5009. Edit: Just to be clear, MikroTik designed the modular platform and is introducing it with the RB5009 Jan 24, 2022 · We decided to try a RB5009 and a RB4011 to see how they would handle the CPU load. As the price level ascends, so too do the number of included features. Will look at it, Thanks!. But, if you just want basic routing and VLANs the UDM would work fine. Both communities are responsive, but OPNSense users often feel they get quicker replies . . Hopefully I can play with it this weekend. Now I've got Adguard Home running in a container, and a bunch of ports forwarded. Sep 29, 2024 · Users often visit its forums to ask questions and share knowledge, and the pfSense community has built a large repository of information over the years. Jul 13, 2024 · Perbandingan Mikrotik Rb4011 vs Mikrotik Rb5009 Mikrotik RB4011 dan RB5009 merupakan dua router handal dari MikroTik yang menawarkan performa kuat dan berbagai fitur untuk kebutuhan jaringan Anda. The UX is great IMO, the metrics are often useful, and I've had no speed issues. Feb 19, 2024 · /boot/kernel/iimb. I only bought mine for testing in my homelab and ended up liking it so much, I replaced my Xeon based pfSense box with the CCR1009 and haven't looked back. Jan 8, 2024 · the RB5009 is enough for your needs based on the 188. 1 along with a homeassistant and unifi controller VMs. I had fun playing with this and thought I'd share. I ballpark that I need to spend about $300 +/- $50 for each OPNsense box. If you want the best performance, upgradability and customizability - go with pfSense/OPNsense. I bought it because it has a 2. If you saturate one direction on the 10G port you're out of bandwidth for the CPU. 2. it has more specific security and convenience features as a firewall. 1+). For the question of using RB4011wifi vs RB5009 (or other router) with APs, I have done this experiment, with both Mikrotik and Ubiquiti APs, and also with the high-end gaming APs such as the ones from ASUS. Apr 4, 2023 · 19:24 Uji IPsec RB5009 19:45 Kelebihan lain dari RB5009 20:40 Mengapa harus MikroTik? 20:49 Apa itu block diagram? 22:14 Perbandingan block diagram generasi sebelumnya 23:01 Diagram blok CCR1009 23:40 Kelemahan router CCR1009 24:16 Hasil tes RB5009 vs CCR1009 24:53 Perbandingan IPsec RB5009 vs CCR1009 25:33 Kesimpulan produk router RB5009 26:20 . Please ensure if you're asking a question you have checked the Wiki First: https://help. Unanswered topics; Active topics; Search; Quick links. Welcome to Reddit's own amateur (ham) radio club. Realized I don't want a configuration issue to cause me being hacked. Unifi APs are hard to beat, but I had no desire to pay the premium required to get one of their switches with SFP+ ports. 5g port for lan/wan, anything on the 1G ports or downstream at 1G gets much worse than 1G performance from the WAN for a lot of people. Having netgate stand behind their product and pfsense is appealing but if the hardware is from a reputable company that does provide warranty, then thats probably good enough for me. make sure you check the chipset of the networking device and make sure whatever OS you plan on running. May 18, 2022 · As for the buy vs build, I am leaning towards buy with possible upgrade possibility, like the Protectli. Nov 15, 2018 · Hi everyone, I wonder to know that did anyone try to install pfSense on Mikrotik Routerboard(any model) ?? It sounds interesting, I have already found a topic which hasn't update from 7 years ago! Apr 9, 2023 · Here is inside the router. Since I won't have any unifi devicies, I'd probably stick with building a pfsense router instead (faster/cheaper). The RB5009 is primarily marketed as a "homelab" device, so I think it's just their way of experimenting with the formfactor before they build out an entire line of them. I wonder what are the biggest pros and cons of pfSense/OPNSense compared to RB5009 in home usage? For the same price I could probably get pfSense appliance or RB5009 but I'd like to know why I should pick one over the other. This is another one of MikroTik’s Marvell-powered units. 5Gbps switches but I need a router capable of the load. RB5009 has it all, and even more! The board features 9 wired ports and a full-sized USB 3. I have a RB5009 router with 3 Unifi APs connected to ethernet ports 6-8. Thanks in advanced Edit 1: Added shopping list, if that may help. ko was installed by package pfSense-kernel-pfSense-23. Love mine. Sep 16, 2023 · I’ve got a heap of Unifi APs so I’m toying between a UDM Pro, RB5009 and an X-sense network appliance. Although, the RB5009 is the price of a new Asus router. Keys for me are ease of use with deep extensibility where I need it. Unifi routing (via USG/UDM/UDMP) but they are always in the context of a small business or complex/big network setup. 5G. Aug 5, 2011 · Pfsense on the other hand is very well laid out and easy to do what I wanted, multi-wan attached to single private lan. General ISP and network discussion also permitted. As far as I can tell Netgate, Rubicon Communications LLC (RCL Look into Pfsense for your router. It's based on HardenedBSD instead of FreeBSD. Feb 8, 2022 · The RB5009 is part of a 10gig network upgrade. However, considering the small price difference, I'd prefer to get the PoE version anyway just for the convenience of having that While researching I found some STH reviews on 2. I love them as switches and I have 4 if them lol. Dec 14, 2024 · For advanced users, the choice between MikroTik RouterOS vs pfSense often depends on specific requirements like customization or hardware support. Im familiar with ASUS and i like their ui, but i know pfsense has a lot more capabilities. Just the standard "Having a problem finding that site". Setup a box with a dual Intel 1GB NIC and installed pfsense. 1 To summarize: pfSense CE on bare metal C3758R, 1300MBit Wireguard throughput OPNsense on bare metal C3758R, 630MBit Wireguard throughput (-51%) pfSense+ on bare metal Ryzen 5700G, 6000MBit Wireguard throughput (with IIMB!) at only ~25% CPU load However, I am debating whether my network needs are simple enough that I should go a little cheaper. fcv vxdn iipswh lzms wvnrsjt mqgeg fndezu etqer glq ihsbzm