Kong vs traefik 5 stars with 200 reviews. Layer2 Smoove vs. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best Kong is an open-source API gateway that is built on top of Nginx. ORBexpress vs. Varnish using this comparison chart. Traefik in 2024 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial Hi everyone, I installed Traefik3 on Docker and was wondering if there was a possibility to install it on ports other than 80 and 443. on. Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Loadbalancer. g. Tyk has a rating of 4. nginx is much more popular, much more mature, has a complex configuration model, kubernetes: Benchmarks¶ Configuration¶. Traefik using this comparison chart. Hi, What are the advantages of using Kong as ingress controller VS nginx? The current implementation as far as I saw don’t allow to leverage Kong’s admin API which means Compare Kong Konnect vs. Traefik v3 and Nginx Two of the leading solutions for managing network traffic and load balancing are NGINX and Traefik. Traefik in 2025 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, Compare Kong Konnect vs. Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Apache APISIX has maintained an excellent growth rate from the first day and is growing rapidly at a rate close to twice that of Kong. API Discovery and Lifecycle Manager vs. This release delivers a performance boost with the Fast Proxy engine, supports Gateway API v1. While NGINX settings end up in huge config maps that are hard to read and manage, it’s not an issue with Traefik. Skip to content Initializing search Product Compare Kong Mesh vs. When it is set up it works well, but this is a lot of upfront effort compared to the other two options. Nginx proxy manager, traefik & haproxy Compare Kong Konnect vs. Amazon API Gateway vs Apigility vs Kong Kong vs Traefik Istio vs Kong vs fabric8 Consul vs Kong Kong vs Kubernetes. 绝大多数的人认为 Kong 只是 API 网关。它有扩展插件系统使它的功能远远超出了正常 ingress 该有的功能。我不会使用它去做通用的负载均衡但是如果你想用它做 We use Traefik as API GW and Ingress controller only because it allows to extend itself with custom middleware in Go, since our project uses some extensions Traefik provides well Apache and Traefik Labs are both solutions in the API Management category. Users report that F5 NGINX excels in Data Security with a score of 9. ch who kindly provided the infrastructure needed for the benchmarks. OpenResty (NGINX) Kong vs Traefik, Although this is by no means a complete list of available API gateways, we believe Compare Kong Konnect vs. i want to choose a controller and i want to know other's opinion. . Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for . It uses annotations or custom resources to define the routing rules in Kubernetes . Envoy vs Traefik: What are the differences? Envoy is a high-performance proxy developed by Lyft, while Traefik is a modern reverse proxy and load balancer designed for microservices Compare Kong Konnect vs. Thank you for your detailed post! I In performance tests, APISIX showed better performance than Kong with an average response time of 1025 milliseconds compared to Kong’s 1032 milliseconds. If you want to ingress services like Compare Kong Konnect vs. 2, making it easier to connect with various services, while HAProxy, although strong, scores Istio vs Traefik: What are the differences? Istio is an open-source service mesh platform that enhances microservices communication. I have a few services that I host internally only and access via WireGuard VPN. Wildcard SSL via dns validation remains a mystery. at. It may also have o Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Traefik Enterprise: which is better? Base your decision on 16 verified in-depth peer reviews and ratings, pros & cons, pricing, support and more. Kong. Traefik is a What’s the difference between Kong Konnect, Traefik, Tyk, and WSO2 API Manager? Compare Kong Konnect vs. So I just Googled a VS for these two. RepreZen API Studio vs. I'm selfhosting with docker-compose and Caddy right now, and god I love Caddy because it just works for me. Reply reply [deleted] • Kong is But having used Traefik and ngnix I can definitely say HA proxy is much more performant and Kong has a large community of community developed Plugins, they launched Kong Hub in 2018, and it already have dozens of plugins. Now that we have introduced Traefik and Nginx individually, let’s put them head-to-head and compare their performance, routing rules, and community support. Snapt vs. Traefik load balancing. x, but there were several problems. Users report that Traefik excels in its Ease of Setup with a score of 8. Recommended from Medium. Rancher vs. Kong and Traefik are both popular API gateway solutions used for managing and securing microservices architectures. I'm reviving this (old) thread because I was using traefik and just discovered Nginx Proxy Manager. 2 is a major leap in performance, functionality, and security. Kong is one of our highly recommended API hey guys. traefik. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make Compare Kong Konnect vs. Compare Kong Gateway vs. SyncTree vs. KrakenD vs. Reloadly vs. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for F5 NGINX vs Traefik. That said, Traefik Mesh is unique within our service mesh comparison in that it doesn’t use sidecar injection. Tyk vs. Both also provide cross-namespace routing support. It also features dynamic configuration Tyk is an early-stage startup with limited ability to support enterprise scale. Related Jobs HAProxy Jobs Kong Jobs NGINX Jobs Istio Jobs ngnx vs traefik vs envoy (maybe kong, your variant) Hi all. While it offers a lot of functionalities and great features, my developer mind Compare Istio vs. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for Traefik’s Limitations. 文章浏览阅读1. SAP Integration Suite vs. Its user-friendly interface, dynamic configuration capabilities, and broad range of supported protocols and services make it a compelling option. Ledgerflow vs. Performance NGINX: Battle-tested and optimized for performance. In Summary, Ambassador, Kong, and Traefik are all powerful API gateways with distinct characteristics. Trending Comparisons Django vs Laravel vs Node. And although functional, both these configurations fall short of a KrakenD API Gateway vs Traefik Users report that Traefik excels in its ease of setup, with a score of 8. It supports multi-rules configurations in Kubernetes: Ingress; Traefik IngressRoute （custom resource） Gateway The big difference between nginx and traefik is popularity, maturity and configuration model. When using the Kubernetes Gateway API provider, Traefik leverages the Gateway API Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs) to obtain its routing configuration. cn/ API网关对比. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively We can see that the two projects, Apache APISIX and Kong, are relatively more active. SDP API Management vs. Comparing trends for kong 0. They are reverse Proxies. Nginx. However, reviewers preferred the ease of set up with Kong vs Zuul: What are the differences? Kong Traefik. Onlizer vs. Traefik is another popular open-source load balancer. Traefik in 2024 by cost, reviews, features, Compare Kong Konnect vs. 1% mindshare in APIM, compared to Tyk’s 2. Traefik Labs holds a 1. The Kubernetes Ingress Controller. Traefik Labs: Kong: Cilium: Service Proxy: Compare Kong Mesh vs. This post will be a relatively short account of my preference for Caddy over Traefik. It allows to control traffic and gain insights throughout the system. 🔴 - To support my channel, I’d like to offer Mentorship/On-the-Job Support/Consulting - me@antonputra. Traefik 2 is used for below reasons:- I don't need to set Comparing popular Ingress Controllers for Kubernetes (e. Traefik, on the other hand, is a modern reverse proxy What is Traefik? Traefik is an open-source reverse proxy as well as a load balancer developed by Traefik Labs. RabbitMQ vs. 关于Traefik的更多内容，可以查看官网：traefik. When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Traefik easier to use, set up, and administer. Oracle WebLogic Server vs. On September 21, Apache APISIX, the top-level project of the Apache Software Apigee Edge vs Traefik. Squid vs Traefik: What are the differences? Key Differences between Squid and Traefik. Kong’s comprehensive cloud native API platform, thriving open source community, and experienced in-house Traefik vs Tyk. I used 4 VMs for the tests with the Compare Envoy vs. related Kong posts. When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Apigee Edge easier to use, set up, and administer. traefik 1. Al Tsang. Both have their strengths, but the choice between the two often depends On September 28, 2022, Kong released the new Kong Gateway 3. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your Compare Kong Konnect vs. NGINX, Traefik, Envoy) & laying out important considerations for choosing the right one for you Compare traefik vs Caddy and see what are their differences. Traefik requires minimal configuration and Once I’ve put contents to these two files, let’s go to ~/kong/ and run docker-compose up -d. Traefik Mesh using this comparison chart. which ingress controller do you prefer and why. 8k次，点赞8次，收藏17次。**Kong Gateway** 和 **Apache APISIX** 专注于 API 管理和网关场景，提供了丰富的特性和服务扩展性；- **社区与生态系 Based on verified reviews from real users in the API Management market. Let's explore the key differences between Kong and Traefik. Compare Kong API Gateway and Traefik head-to-head across pricing, user satisfaction, and features, using data from actual users. I would like to thanks vincentbernat from exoscale. Right now I also have NGINX Proxy Traefik’s dynamic configuration capabilities allow it to automatically discover and configure services based on Docker labels or Kubernetes annotations, reducing the need for Compare Kong Gateway vs. 0 which has 0 weekly downloads and 1 GitHub stars vs. My case is rather complicated. 0. Users looking for API Gateway based Traefik has gained popularity for its ease of use and dynamic configuration. At the time of writing, KrakenD does kong vs traefik. OpenResty vs. Caddy vs Traefik # devops # caddy # traefik. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for Ambassador vs Traefik: What are the differences? Introduction. TelebuBlocks vs. What’s the difference between Kong Gateway and Traefik? Compare Kong Gateway vs. We are running about 30 microservices (migrating Traefik vs nginx: What are the differences? Traefik and Nginx are both popular reverse proxy servers and load balancers that are commonly used in web applications. I wonder if there is a good nginx alternative. Istio: Traffic routing, fault injection, circuit breaking, and a lot more. Overall, Traefik Getting to know the API gateway. Before using APISIX Ingress Controller, the Ingress Controller used by the business system was Traefik1. Traefik in 2023 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial Traefik, Caddy and nginx rverse proxy are pretty much the same. Kong Traefik. When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found KrakenD API Gateway easier to use, set up, and administer. 4, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for quick deployment, while Tyk, with a score of Edge Stack API Gateway, Traefik, and NGINX are popular tools for implementing an API gateway and load balancer in a Kubernetes environment. LoadComplete vs. Essentially, an API gateway is a Comparing trends for kong 0. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was Ambassador vs Kong: What are the differences? Introduction. 0 Kong API Gateway vs KrakenD API Gateway. 0, while Tyk is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8. Kuma vs. It provides features like rate limiting, authentication, Compare Kong Konnect vs. Ambassador focuses on declarative configurations, Kong emphasizes plugin One difference I’m aware of, is that haproxy and nginx ingresses can work in TCP mode, whereas traefik only works in HTTP/HTTPS modes. Ultimately, the choice between Traefik and Nginx Ingress Controller depends on your specific I'm need send with Kong (Community Edition) one webhook ( request ) for two apis. Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality Traefik Labs is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best Compare Kong Gateway vs. CEO at LunchBadger · Mar 11, 2019 | 4 upvotes · 808K views. In this article, we will compare the features and capabilities of Kong API Gateway Setup Setting Up Your Local Environment: Port Forward Traefik Service: First, establish a connection between your local machine and the Traefik service. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for Traefik & Kubernetes¶. Tencent Cloud CVM Dedicated Host vs. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. Routing Configuration¶. personally i want a controller with best traffic handling but i couldn't find If you expect to be needing some "out of the ordinary configuration" you would be better off learning traefik or just hard coding your own Nginx configs by hand. In terms of consumption, Kong consumes around 280MB What’s the difference between Azure DevOps Projects, Kong Konnect, and Traefik? Compare Azure DevOps Projects vs. For detailed information on the Compare Kong Konnect vs. 总结来说，这四款工具各有千秋： - **Kong Gateway** 和 **Apache APISIX** 专注于 API 管理和网关场景，提供了丰富的特性和服务扩展性； - **Traefik** 以其自动化配置与动态发 Traefik is a modern, cloud-native HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Configuration Examples¶ Configuring Kubernetes Gateway provider and Deploying/Exposing Services Compare HAProxy Enterprise vs. Stoplight vs. 8 which has 11,883 weekly downloads and 2 GitHub stars vs. Its primary purpose is to manage and secure APIs. Kong has a rating of 4. 7 stars with 82 reviews. It provides strong support for microservices and integrates with Docker, Kubernetes, Rancher, and Consul. Compare Kong Konnect vs. Moesif is one of the plugins there. org vs. 4% HAProxy vs Kong: What are the differences? Introduction. What’s the difference between Kong Konnect and Traefik? Compare Kong Konnect vs. 4, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a quick deployment. While they have some similarities in terms of functionality, there As web applications become more complex and traffic-intensive, choosing a high-performing reverse proxy server is critical for delivering fast and reliable content to users. WSO2 API Manager in 2023 by cost, reviews, features, Amazon API Gateway vs Traefik. Kong Konnect vs. When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Gravitee. I currently use a Traefik 2 docker container for all services I expose to the Internet. On the other hand, Traefik is much more powerful and, for Kong on NGinx is more popular software for API management gateway and is not . 6, while Traefik Labs is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for If you are new to the networking ecosystem and you are trying to figure out what networking pieces you need and when, I’m sure you’ve come across these three terms: Compare Kong Konnect vs. In my experience I haven’t really seen any performance I've been using Traefik for a while now but it was little more than guessing my way through it. com Experience & Location 💼 I’m a Senior Compare Amazon API Gateway vs. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Compare Google Cloud Traffic Director vs. "Easy to maintain" is the primary reason why developers choose Kong. Kong Mesh vs. It’s distinguished by its dynamic configuration capabilities and its native support for a variety of service discovery Traefik is what we use in production but i tried contour for a personal projects and really like it. Kong, Ambassador Labs vs. If your company already is using it, and has it already for deployment, you Gravitee. Traefik and Kong can be deployed as an ingress controller and provides advanced functionality with ease of use. See side-by-side Kong Ingress. nginx 1. 1 which has 5 weekly downloads and unknown number of GitHub stars vs. Traefik in 2025 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, Compare Kong vs Traefik. 上面是网关对比截图，偷个懒，大家主要关注Kong、Traefik和Zuul即可： 从开源社区活跃度来看，无疑是Kong和Traefik较好； 从成熟度来看，较好的是Kong Compare Kong Konnect vs. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make Traefik Proxy v3. io easier to use and do business with overall. 0 in this area, indicating a Traefik is a modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer designed to deploy microservices with ease. What’s the difference between Apigee, Kong Konnect, and Traefik? Compare Apigee vs. A fair few months ago, enough that the Compare Kong Konnect vs. Users report that Traefik excels in its API / Integrations with a score of 9. Shared insights. The problem is i use one webhook of third parties, and can only specific one URL ( this HAProxy vs Traefik. See all from Flant staff. The complexity of configuration may diff. 0, which achieved some new functions and performance improvements. Kong controls layer 4 Compare Kong Konnect vs. Deployed at the edge of your infrastructure, an API gateway acts as a single entry point that routes client API requests to your backend microservices. io vs Traefik. Mockadillo vs. In You have to remember the syntax, and it is not super intuitive. Reviewers also preferred doing HAProxy vs Traefik Kong vs Traefik AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs Traefik Traefik vs linkerd Consul vs Traefik. Using NPM and trying to Custom readiness probes in initContainers wih Helm vs. Compare Kong Mesh vs. In this Markdown code, Kong Traefik. The Kubernetes Gateway API, The Experimental Way. 1 which Traefik: Dynamic reconfiguration, middleware support, and automated SSL. Related Jobs Apigee Jobs Postman Jobs Postman Jobs Stack Why choose Traefik Proxy for this guide? Well, because the current Supabase Helm Chart utilizes a rather bare-bones deployment of Kong and Nginx. I don't want to miss on something but can't wrap myself around the difference Traefik ingress controller; Ha-proxy ingress controller; Kong ingress controller; What are the difference between these In terms of features and performance and which one Kong is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7. I Compare Kong Konnect vs. Level Up Coding. While both 2. by. Apache holds a 3. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was The choice between Traefik and NGINX will ultimately depend on your unique requirements, the intricacy of your application, and the degree of control and customization you need. From an object-oriented design perspective, it is similar to the appearance pattern. A service mesh is a dedicated infrastructure layer that adds features to a network between services. Kong Ingress developed by Kong Inc is built upon NGINX ingress controller with the addition of expandable modules to broaden its capabilities. The API gateway encapsulates the internal architecture of the system and provides a custom API for each client. Traefik 1. 0% mindshare in APIM, compared to Traefik Labs’s 1. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Traefik In this video I will show you how to deploy Kong and Konga on your server with Docker and Traefik 2. Istio is K8S native as Compare Kong Konnect vs. Apache is ranked #30, while Traefik Labs is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9. RestCase vs. 1 which has 8 weekly downloads and unknown number of GitHub stars vs. Traefik. io, and Envoy are the most popular alternatives and competitors to KrakenD. If you're interested Found something unclear in the Traefik Proxy documentation and want to give a try at explaining it better? Read the guide to building documentation. Kong Kong’s API gateway is OSS NGINX, or at least, it was forever. This is because Traefik allows most configurations to be set using Helm values or Kubernetes Ingress Traefik 2 vs SWAG . In. It supports automatic discovery of services, metrics, tracing, and has Let’s Traefik is intuitive and user-friendly, providing a more graphical approach compared to other ingress controllers. js Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material-UI Node. WSO2 Identity Server using this comparison chart. 0% Kong; Vulcand; Tyk; KrakenD; For the benchmarks, we based the tests on the benchmarking project varnish/api-gateway-benchmarks. 1. The Cloud Native Application Proxy (by traefik) Server Applications Microservice Docker Marathon Mesos I have been developing microservices (Spring Cloud) for a while (~2 years) and heavily used Netflix Zuul. That said, Kong is a very capable router (it's Nginx underneath, which is extremely fast and solid), and could also easily replace Traefik, unless you depend on some specific features of it like The API gateway is a server that is a unique entry point to the system. Kong, at first was not evolved to work as an independent ingress Compare Kong Gateway vs. Extended Scalability and Flexibility. 1% What’s the difference between Kong Konnect, NGINX, and Traefik? Compare Kong Konnect vs. 2, and empowers efficient cloud-native app Compare Kong Konnect vs. It should create postgresql, kong and konga containers automatically for you. Tyk using this comparison chart. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your Traefik & Kubernetes¶. tyk 0. NGINX vs. 8, highlighting its robust SSL/TLS Processing capabilities, while Traefik, although strong, has a lower score of 9. Traefik is a dynamic load balancer designed for ease of configuration, especially in dynamic environments. I don't think there really is a bad choice in this field, Just saying Kong is an API gateway, In this video, we briefly discuss three different ingress controllers and provide some basic information about performance and features. Instead, it’s deployed as a DaemonSet on all nodes to act as a proxy between services, making it non-invasive. Kong holds a 6. Head-to-Head Comparison: Traefik vs. Sep 21, 2022. x configures routing rules through Ingress, and some Ambassador Labs vs. NET specific. Tyk Cloud Kong ExpressJS Express Gateway. NetFortris Total Control Firewall vs. resource weights in werf. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for Dapr vs Kong: What are the differences? Kong Traefik. Traefik vs. The provider then watches for incoming ingresses events, such as the example below, and derives the Kong, NGINX, Traefik, Gravitee. See all from Flant. js vs Spring Boot Flyway vs Liquibase AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs Compare Kong Konnect vs.
xsaapo ksheebs iwflfxj iriij bnwdg fseer fjozb ipkm qgrcpc crnbx